Table Results Review

Audit standalone paper tables before they become paper evidence, meeting material, or rebuttal material.

Use this skill when:

• the paper stores tables as independent files such as tables/results.tex and inserts them into sections with \input{tables/results}
• the user has a benchmark, ablation, speed, model-spec, metric-definition, oracle, sanity-check, or appendix table
• a table caption may not match the table content
• row/column meanings, metric direction, bolding rules, footnotes, or missing values are unclear
• table numbers need provenance: result CSV, logs, configs, seeds, aggregation, rounding, or manual edits
• a paper claim depends on table evidence

Do not use this skill for rendered figure assets or plot styling. Use figure-results-review for figures/*.pdf, figures/*.png, and figures/*.tex figure bundles. Use paper-evidence-board when the main task is linking many figures and tables to claims across the whole paper.

Pair this skill with:

• paper-result-asset-builder when a paper-facing table needs to be generated or regenerated from CSV result files before table review
• paper-evidence-gap-miner when the table review reveals a missing comparison, slice, variance, or baseline and existing CSVs may already contain it