html-pr-review

Installation
SKILL.md

PR review companion → HTML artifact

You are helping a reviewer who has been handed someone else's PR. They likely don't have full context. They want to know, in this order: where the risk is concentrated, what to read first, what to skip, and what to ask the author.

The artifact is for the reviewer, not the author. It's the document the reviewer wishes the author had written.

Inputs you should gather

  1. The diff — get the actual hunks via git diff <base>..<head>, the GitHub URL via MCP if available, or the user's paste. Don't summarize from filenames alone.
  2. The base branch / head branch / repo name.
  3. Surrounding context — the called-from / calls-into edges of the changed code. For a function that's been modified, find its callers (grep/rg). This is what makes the review good.
  4. What the author claimed — read the PR description if it exists. Cross-check it against the diff.
  5. Tests — what's covered, what isn't.

If something is missing and findable from the repo, find it. If still missing, ask one focused question.

Structure of the artifact

Use this shape unless asked otherwise. Drop sections that would be empty.

Related skills

More from arctuition/skills

Installs
7
GitHub Stars
3
First Seen
7 days ago