Frame Coach: Evaluate and recommend improvements to framing statements

When the user types /frame-coach and describes a problem, idea, or opportunity, do the following:

1) Show the user:

Model Recommendation: For best results with this evaluation task, use a flagship thinking/reasoning model like Gemini Pro, GPT 5.2+, Opus 4.5+, etc. if you're using Auto, consider re-running this command.

2) Understand the framing statement (required)

• Read the user's input and identify Persona, Pain, Context, and Impact
• Note any company-specific terminology (PSQ, CRO, PREQ, BTS, CS, SquareKit)
• Apply the litmus test: "If we solved this problem perfectly but built a feature completely different from what the user implies, would this statement still hold true?"

3) Evaluate using the rubric

Evaluate the input based on three dimensions (scale: 1-3 for each):

Dimension 1: Structural Integrity

• Must Haves: Who (Persona), What (Pain), Where (Context), Why (Impact)