Multi-Lens

Meta — Dynamic Multi-Agent. View a problem through multiple perspectives via debate or polling.

Core Question: "What do multiple expert perspectives converge on — and where do they genuinely disagree?"

Critical Gates — Read First

1. Choose the right mode — debate for trade-off decisions, poll for filtering hallucinations and finding consensus. If unsure, default to debate (richer output for fewer agents).
2. Problem must be specific — N agents on a fuzzy prompt wastes tokens. If the problem is vague, ask the user to sharpen it before spawning.
3. Agents must produce structured output — freeform prose can't be aggregated. Every agent returns a defined format.
4. Cost scales with agent count — 3 debate agents × 3 rounds ≈ $0.30-0.50. 10 poll agents ≈ $0.30-0.50. Default to sonnet unless user requests opus.

Inputs Required

• A specific problem, decision, or question from the user
• Optional: agent count, round count, preferred mode (debate/poll), custom roles

Output

• .agents/meta/multi-lens-report.md — synthesis with consensus, disagreements, recommendation