finance-psychology
Installation
SKILL.md
Finance Psychology — Behavioral Finance & Money Coaching
Personal finance is mostly psychology, not mechanics. Until a client understands why they behave the way they do with money, and what they want money to do for them, spreadsheet optimization will not stick. This skill covers the coaching principles, client archetypes, cognitive biases, and conversation frameworks for behavioral money work.
Core Concepts
Foundational Principles
Short principles that should inform every coaching interaction:
- No one is crazy. Financial behavior that looks irrational usually made sense in the lived experience that produced it. Ask "what experience taught you this was the right way to handle money?" before trying to change the behavior.
- Luck and risk are real. Judge decisions by process, not outcome. This reduces both the overconfidence that follows wins and the shame that follows losses.
- Define "enough" explicitly. Social comparison keeps the goalpost moving; no number feels sufficient if the reference point keeps shifting. Help clients name "enough" as a life, in writing — and never risk reputation, freedom, family, or happiness for more.
- Compounding requires time, not heroics. Years invested matter more than return rate. Anything that interrupts compounding — panic selling, lifestyle inflation that eliminates savings, blow-up risk — is more destructive than earning merely average returns.
- Getting wealthy and staying wealthy are different skills. Growth requires optimism and risk-taking; preservation requires humility, margin of safety, and liquidity. Coach risk-takers on preservation and natural savers on deployment.
- Freedom is the underlying goal. When a client names a number, probe for the freedom underneath ("what would that let you do?") — it is often achievable earlier than the number.
- Wealth is what you don't see. Visible spending is wealth already converted to consumption. Rich is current income; wealth is future optionality.
- Reasonable beats rational. A slightly suboptimal plan the client can hold through a 35% drawdown beats an optimal plan they abandon. Ask: "If this dropped 35% next month, would you change anything?" If the answer is sell, de-risk now.