ai-moderating-content
Auto-Moderate What Users Post
Guide the user through building AI content moderation — classify user-generated content, score severity, and route decisions (auto-approve, human-review, auto-reject). The pattern: classify, score, route.
When NOT to use AI moderation
- Low-volume content — if a human can review everything in under an hour per day, skip AI. The complexity of maintaining a moderation pipeline is not worth it.
- Exact-match violations only — if your policy is just a blocklist of words or regex patterns (SSNs, emails, phone numbers), use pattern matching directly. No LM needed.
- Legal-grade decisions — AI moderation is a first pass, not a legal ruling. If a wrong moderation decision has legal consequences (DMCA takedowns, defamation claims), always route to human review.
Consider /ai-sorting instead if you just need classification without severity scoring or routing logic.
Step 1: Define your moderation policy
Ask the user:
- What content do you need to catch? (hate speech, spam, NSFW, harassment, self-harm, illegal activity, PII)
- What are the severity levels? (warning, remove, ban)
- What is the tolerance for false positives? (over-moderating frustrates users)
- Is human review in the loop? (auto-only vs. auto + human escalation)
More from lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills
ai-switching-models
Switch AI providers or models without breaking things. Use when you want to switch from OpenAI to Anthropic, try a cheaper model, stop depending on one vendor, compare models side-by-side, a model update broke your outputs, you need vendor diversification, or you want to migrate to a local model. Also use when your prompt broke after a model update, prompts that work for GPT-4 do not work for Claude or Llama, or you need to do a model migration. Covers DSPy model portability with provider config, re-optimization, model comparison, and multi-model pipelines. Also used for migrate from OpenAI to Anthropic, GPT to Claude migration, try Llama instead of GPT, model comparison framework, multi-provider AI setup, avoid vendor lock-in for AI, prompts break when switching models, model-agnostic AI code.
57ai-stopping-hallucinations
Stop your AI from making things up. Use when your AI hallucinates, fabricates facts, is not grounded in real data, does not cite sources, makes unsupported claims, or you need to verify AI responses against source material. Also use when your LLM makes up facts, responses are disconnected from the input, or outputs are not grounded in source documents. Covers citation enforcement, faithfulness verification, grounding via retrieval, confidence thresholds, and evaluation of anti-hallucination quality. Also used for AI makes up citations, LLM fabricates data, ground AI in source documents, RAG but AI still hallucinates, force AI to cite sources, factual accuracy for AI, prevent AI from inventing facts, AI confident but wrong, LLM confabulation, hallucination detection, verify AI claims against documents.
51ai-do
Describe your AI problem and get routed to the right skill with a ready-to-use prompt. Use when you are not sure which ai- skill to use, want help picking the right approach, or just want to describe what you need in plain language. Also use this when someone says I want to build an AI that..., how do I make my AI..., or describes any AI/LLM task without naming a specific skill, I need AI but do not know where to start, which AI pattern should I use, what is the best way to add AI to my app, recommend an AI approach, AI feature discovery, too many AI options, overwhelmed by AI frameworks, just tell me what to build, new to DSPy, beginner AI project help, which LLM pattern fits my use case, confused about AI architecture, help me figure out my AI approach.
25ai-reasoning
Make AI solve hard problems that need planning and multi-step thinking. Use when your AI fails on complex questions, needs to break down problems, requires multi-step logic, needs to plan before acting, gives wrong answers on math or analysis tasks, or when a simple prompt is not enough for the reasoning required. Covers ChainOfThought, ProgramOfThought, MultiChainComparison, and Self-Discovery reasoning patterns in DSPy., AI gives shallow answers, LLM does not think before answering, chain of thought prompting, make AI show its work, AI fails at math, complex analysis with LLM, multi-step problem solving, AI reasoning errors, LLM logic mistakes, think step by step DSPy, AI cannot do basic arithmetic, deep reasoning with language models, self-consistency for better answers, tree of thought.
23ai-building-chatbots
Build a conversational AI assistant with memory and state. Use when you need a customer support chatbot, helpdesk bot, onboarding assistant, sales qualification bot, FAQ assistant, or any multi-turn conversational AI. Also used for chatbot remember previous messages, conversational AI keeps forgetting context, build a helpdesk bot that actually works, chatbot drops context after a few turns, Intercom bot alternative, Zendesk AI alternative, build WhatsApp bot, Slack bot with AI, chatbot escalation to human agent, LangChain chatbot but simpler, chatbot for SaaS onboarding flow.
23ai-improving-accuracy
Measure and improve how well your AI works. Use when AI gives wrong answers, accuracy is bad, responses are unreliable, you need to test AI quality, evaluate your AI, write metrics, benchmark performance, optimize prompts, improve results, or systematically make your AI better. Also used for spent hours tweaking prompts, trial and error prompt engineering is not working, quality plateaued early, stale prompts everywhere in your codebase, my AI is only 60% accurate, how to measure AI quality, AI evaluation framework, benchmark my LLM, prompt optimization not working, systematic way to improve AI, AI accuracy plateaued, DSPy optimizer tutorial, MIPROv2 optimization, how to go from 70% to 90% accuracy.
22