generic-by-design
Generic by Design
Scan an artifact for organization-specific fingerprints, decide which are leaks vs. legitimate references, then mask the leaks with generic placeholders or multi-option illustrative lists. The goal: anyone can install / fork / read the artifact without learning the original author's stack, history, or environment.
When to use
- The user says "generic-by-design okay" — the canonical trigger.
- The user pasted content (skill, template, README, blog post, code) lifted from a private repo and wants it sharable.
- The user is publishing a skill or library and asks to "make sure no internal stuff leaks".
- A scaffolded template has hardcoded values from the original cloud / vendor / org.
- A new skill was built by adapting an existing one and the source author's name appears in the credits.
Skip this skill for: code that genuinely needs the proprietary references (internal-only docs, runbooks for a specific environment), or for tool-name lists that are inclusive-by-design (a multi-provider list is intentional, not a leak).
How this skill is itself generic-by-design
The skill content (SKILL.md, references/, examples/) describes patterns abstractly — using placeholder shapes (<vendor-saas>, <cloud-region>, <source-author>) and synthetic worked-example names (Acme, FrontEdge, Cumulus, PayLink) — never concrete real vendor or author names that would anchor on the author's history.
The scanner's wordlists of concrete patterns live in scripts/data/*.txt — tool data, separated from skill content, the way a spell checker has a dictionary file. Users edit those wordlists to add their own org-specific patterns; the markdown content stays abstract.
More from mkabumattar/skills
linux-script-developer
Write production-ready Bash scripts with strict error handling (`set -euo pipefail`), validated argument parsing, colored user feedback, and cross-platform compatibility (Linux, macOS, Windows via Git Bash/WSL). Use this skill whenever the user asks for a `.sh` script, a shell script, a Bash one-liner installer, a deployment script, an automation/CI script, a CLI wrapper, or a file-batch processor — including casual phrasings like "write a script to ...", "automate this in bash", or "make me a shell tool". Also use when reviewing or hardening an existing Bash script.
16skill-builder
Build a new Agent Skill that follows the agentskills.io specification and best practices — slim `SKILL.md` (≤ 200 lines / 5K tokens), valid kebab-case `name`, imperative `description` under 1024 chars, progressive disclosure via `references/`, bundled `assets/` and `scripts/`, and an MIT `LICENSE`. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, build, write, or author a new Agent Skill — including phrasings like "build a skill for X", "scaffold a new skill", "create an agent skill", "make me a skill that does X", "write a SKILL.md for ...", or "I want to publish a skill on agentskills.io". Also use when reviewing or refactoring an existing oversized `SKILL.md` (a sign that detail should be moved to `references/`).
15python-script-developer
Write production-ready Python CLI tools, automation scripts, and batch file processors with type hints, structured `logging` (never `print` for diagnostics), `argparse` interfaces, `pathlib` for filesystem work, specific exception handling, and cross-platform support (Linux, macOS, Windows). Use this skill whenever the user asks to create a Python script, `.py` utility, CLI tool, automation, batch processor, or data pipeline — including casual phrasings like "write a python script that ...", "automate this in python", "I need a small tool", or "give me a one-off processor". Also use when reviewing or hardening an existing Python script.
15information-architecture
Plan the structural and execution architecture of a feature, app, or site — produce both an `INFORMATION_ARCHITECTURE.md` (site map, navigation, content hierarchy, user flows, URL strategy, naming conventions, component reuse map) AND a phased `PLAN.md` (phases by impact/effort/risk, vertical-slice tasks with sub-tasks, dependencies, estimates, and a detailed task breakdown with Why/How/Impact/Effort). Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a product or feature, design site structure, lay out information architecture, map user flows, organize content, break work into phases, build a roadmap, plan an implementation order, or hits you with phrases like "plan the IA", "map the structure", "break this into tasks", "give me a roadmap", "phase out the work", "create an enhancement plan", or "what should I build first". Also use when reviewing or refactoring an existing IA or project plan.
15makefile-script-developer
Write production-ready GNU Makefiles with strict shell mode (`SHELL := /bin/bash` + `.SHELLFLAGS := -euo pipefail -c`), validated multi-environment configuration via `$(filter ...)`, pre-flight check targets (`check-tools`, `check-env`), structured logging with timestamps, confirmation gates for destructive ops, layered `.env` includes, platform detection, and self-documenting help. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write a Makefile, harden an existing one, add a target, build a deploy/release pipeline, automate Terraform/Helm/Kubernetes/Docker/build workflows, or expose tasks as `make <target>` — including casual phrasings like "write a Makefile", "add a make target", "automate this in make", "give me a build pipeline", or "clean up the Makefile". Also use when reviewing an existing Makefile for safety, error handling, or organization issues.
15qa
Run an interactive QA session — the user describes bugs and issues conversationally, you ask brief clarifying questions, explore the codebase for domain context, decide whether to file one issue or break it down, and create durable user-focused GitHub issues via `gh issue create` — without referencing internal file paths or line numbers. Use this skill whenever the user wants to do QA, report bugs, file issues, walk through a list of problems, or hits you with phrases like "let's do a QA session", "I found a bug", "this is broken", "file this as an issue", "I have a few things to report", or "let's go through these one by one". Also use when the user is reviewing a deployed feature and wants to track defects.
14