code-review

Installation
Summary

Technical rigor in code review: receiving feedback critically, requesting systematic reviews, and verifying before any completion claims.

  • Three core practices: receiving feedback with technical evaluation over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before status claims
  • Includes decision tree and protocols for handling feedback from human partners versus external reviewers, with explicit rules against performative responses
  • Verification gates require running fresh commands and reading output before claiming tests pass, builds succeed, or work is complete
  • Designed for subagent-driven development workflows, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims through evidence-based verification
SKILL.md

Code Review

Guide proper code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification over performative responses.

Overview

Code review requires three distinct practices:

  1. Receiving feedback - Technical evaluation over performative agreement
  2. Requesting reviews - Systematic review via code-reviewer subagent
  3. Verification gates - Evidence before any completion claims

Each practice has specific triggers and protocols detailed in reference files.

Core Principle

Technical correctness over social comfort. Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Evidence before claims.

When to Use This Skill

Related skills

More from mrgoonie/claudekit-skills

Installs
387
GitHub Stars
2.1K
First Seen
Jan 22, 2026