agent-evaluation
Evaluation Methods for Claude Code Agents
Evaluation of agent systems requires different approaches than traditional software or even standard language model applications. Agents make dynamic decisions, are non-deterministic between runs, and often lack single correct answers. Effective evaluation must account for these characteristics while providing actionable feedback. A robust evaluation framework enables continuous improvement, catches regressions, and validates that context engineering choices achieve intended effects.
Core Concepts
Agent evaluation requires outcome-focused approaches that account for non-determinism and multiple valid paths. Multi-dimensional rubrics capture various quality aspects: factual accuracy, completeness, citation accuracy, source quality, and tool efficiency. LLM-as-judge provides scalable evaluation while human evaluation catches edge cases.
The key insight is that agents may find alternative paths to goals—the evaluation should judge whether they achieve right outcomes while following reasonable processes.
Performance Drivers: The 95% Finding Research on the BrowseComp evaluation (which tests browsing agents' ability to locate hard-to-find information) found that three factors explain 95% of performance variance:
| Factor | Variance Explained | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Token usage | 80% | More tokens = better performance |
| Number of tool calls | ~10% | More exploration helps |
| Model choice | ~5% | Better models multiply efficiency |
More from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit
sdd:plan
Refine, parallelize, and verify a draft task specification into a fully planned implementation-ready task
550sdd:implement
Implement a task with automated LLM-as-Judge verification for critical steps
525customaize-agent:prompt-engineering
Use this skill when you writing commands, hooks, skills for Agent, or prompts for sub agents or any other LLM interaction, including optimizing prompts, improving LLM outputs, or designing production prompt templates.
512code-review:review-local-changes
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
511sdd:brainstorm
Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes
509sdd:add-task
creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent
503