systematic-qa
Systematic Project QA
Procedures
Step 1: Discover the Repository QA Contract
- Read root instructions, repository docs, and CI/build files before running commands.
- Execute
python3 scripts/discover-project-contract.py --root .to surface candidate install, verify, build, test, lint, and start commands. - Prefer repository-defined umbrella commands such as
make verify,just verify, or CI entrypoints over language-default commands. - Read
references/project-signals.mdwhen command ownership is ambiguous or when multiple ecosystems are present. - Identify the changed surface and the regression-critical surface before choosing scenarios.
- Choose a QA artifact location using repository conventions. If the repository has no QA artifact convention, store scratch artifacts under
/tmp/codex-qa-<slug>.
Step 2: Define the QA Scope
- Build a short execution matrix covering baseline verification, changed workflows, and unchanged business-critical workflows.
- Read
references/checklist.mdand ensure every required category has a planned validation. - Prefer public entry points such as CLI commands, HTTP endpoints, browser flows, worker jobs, and documented setup commands over internal test helpers.
- Create the smallest realistic fixture or fake project needed to exercise the workflow when the repository does not already include one.
More from pedronauck/skills
skill-best-practices
Authors and structures professional-grade agent skills following the agentskills.io spec. Use when creating new skill directories, drafting procedural instructions, or optimizing metadata for discoverability. Don't use for general documentation, non-agentic library code, or README files.
241architectural-analysis
Deep architectural audit focused on finding dead code, duplicated functionality, architectural anti-patterns, type confusion, and code smells. Use when user asks for architectural analysis, find dead code, identify duplication, or assess codebase health. Don't use for style/formatting issues, performance profiling, security audits, or feature-level code review.
200brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
175typescript-advanced
Master TypeScript's advanced type system including generics, conditional types, mapped types, template literals, and utility types for building type-safe applications. Use when implementing complex type logic, creating reusable type utilities, or ensuring compile-time type safety in TypeScript projects. Don't use for plain JavaScript, runtime validation libraries (Zod, Yup), or basic TypeScript syntax questions.
172ui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 9 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient. Integrations: shadcn/ui MCP for component search and examples.
169no-workarounds
Enforce root-cause fixes over workarounds, hacks, and symptom patches in all software engineering tasks. Use when debugging issues, fixing bugs, resolving test failures, planning solutions, making architectural decisions, or reviewing code changes. Activates gate functions that detect and reject common workaround patterns such as type assertions, lint suppressions, error swallowing, timing hacks, and monkey patches. Don't use for trivial formatting changes or documentation-only edits.
168