sharingan
Sharingan — Skill Replication
Trigger
- Keywords: sharingan, copy skill, replicate skill, clone skill, analyze repo skills, import skill, adapt plugin, skill migration, learn from article, extract pattern, replicate from code
- User provides any input (GitHub URL, web URL, description, local path) and wants to create sd0x-dev-flow skill definitions
When NOT to Use
| Scenario | Alternative |
|---|---|
| Creating new skill from scratch | skill-creator plugin |
| Project onboarding / structure scan | /repo-intake |
| Code review or code exploration | /code-explore, /codex-review-fast |
| Understanding a repo's architecture | /architecture |
| Adversarial brainstorm on approach | /codex-brainstorm |
Argument Validation
More from sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow
statusline-config
Customize Claude Code statusline. Use when: user says 'statusline', 'status line', 'customize statusline', 'modify statusline', 'statusline settings', 'statusline theme', 'change theme', 'color scheme', wants to add/remove/change segments (cost, git, model, context), switch color themes (catppuccin, dracula, nord), or asks what can be shown in the statusline.
53tech-spec
Tech spec generation and review. Use when: designing features, writing specs, spec review. Not for: requirements analysis (use req-analyze), implementation (use feature-dev), architecture advice (use codex-architect). Output: numbered tech spec document.
47codex-brainstorm
Adversarial brainstorming via Claude+Codex debate. Use when: exploring solutions, feasibility analysis, exhaustive enumeration. Not for: implementation (use feature-dev), architecture only (use codex-architect). Output: Nash equilibrium consensus + action items.
7security-review
Security review via Codex MCP. Use when: OWASP Top 10 audit, dependency vulnerability check, security-sensitive changes. Not for: code review (use codex-code-review), test review (use test-review). Output: security findings + audit report.
7test-review
Test coverage review via Codex MCP. Use when: reviewing test sufficiency, identifying coverage gaps, test quality audit. Not for: generating tests (use codex-test-gen), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: coverage analysis + gap report.
7codex-code-review
Code review using Codex MCP. Use when: PR review, code audit, second opinion on changes. Not for: doc review (use doc-review), security audit (use security-review). Output: severity-grouped findings + merge gate.
7