capture-context
Capture Context
Make the plan file self-contained so implementation can proceed after clearing context.
Step 1: Locate the Plan File
Find the active plan file path from the plan mode system prompt. Read the file to determine whether it already has content.
If no plan file exists, create one at the path specified by plan mode.
Step 2: Scan the Conversation
Extract information across these categories. Skip any category where nothing relevant was discussed.
- Work State — Commits made, branches created, PRs opened. Current branch and its relationship to the base branch. Build and test status. What is implemented vs. what remains.
- Codebase Findings — Files explored and their relevance. Reference implementations discovered (exact file paths and line ranges). Patterns and utilities identified for reuse. Architecture or module boundaries understood.
- Decisions and Rationale — Approaches chosen and why. Alternatives considered and why they were rejected. Constraints that shaped the design. User preferences expressed during discussion.
- Requirements Refinement — How the original request evolved through discussion. Scope narrowed or expanded. Acceptance criteria clarified. Dependencies identified.
- Open Questions — Unresolved items that need attention during implementation. Assumptions made that should be verified. Risks or unknowns flagged.
More from tobihagemann/turbo
find-dead-code
Find dead code using parallel subagent analysis and optional CLI tools, treating code only referenced from tests as dead. Use when the user asks to \"find dead code\", \"find unused code\", \"find unused exports\", \"find unreferenced functions\", \"clean up dead code\", or \"what code is unused\". Analysis-only — does not modify or delete code.
31simplify-code
Run a multi-agent review of changed files for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues followed by automated fixes. Use when the user asks to \"simplify code\", \"review changed code\", \"check for code reuse\", \"review code quality\", \"review efficiency\", \"simplify changes\", \"clean up code\", \"refactor changes\", or \"run simplify\".
24investigate
Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to \"investigate this bug\", \"debug this\", \"figure out why this fails\", \"find the root cause\", \"why is this broken\", \"troubleshoot this\", \"diagnose the issue\", \"what's causing this error\", \"look into this failure\", \"why is this test failing\", or \"track down this bug\".
23smoke-test
Launch the app and hands-on verify that it works by interacting with it. Use when the user asks to \"smoke test\", \"test it manually\", \"verify it works\", \"try it out\", \"run a smoke test\", \"check it in the browser\", or \"does it actually work\". Not for unit/integration tests.
23finalize
Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to \"finalize implementation\", \"finalize changes\", \"wrap up implementation\", \"finish up\", \"ready to commit\", or \"run QA workflow\".
23evaluate-findings
Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to \"evaluate findings\", \"assess review comments\", \"triage review feedback\", \"evaluate review output\", or \"filter false positives\".
23