Peer Review

Independent peer review via Claude. Translates a natural-language review request into a Claude-specific prompt so invocations stay implementation-agnostic.

Step 1: Determine Review Request

Extract from the current context:

• Material — code diff, files, plan, feedback, or other artifact to review
• Review dimensions — correctness, security, API usage, consistency, simplicity, coverage, plan readiness, feedback interpretation, or explicit user criteria
• Criteria — reference file paths Claude should read directly, inline criteria text, or the material's own domain conventions
• Prior adjudications — findings already judged, one line each with its verdict and the recorded reason; optional
• Output format — findings schema, verdict labels, priority scale, and any required metadata fields

If no reviewable material is available, stop and state that material is required.

Step 2: Build the Claude Prompt

Assemble a prompt for Claude: