Narrative Resonance Monitor

Measures whether the durable brand narrative is actually landing in the market — an echo rate (how much of the market's own language overlaps the narrative-registry canon lexicon, with the matching method declared), an AI-answer perception read (how answer engines describe the brand versus the canon, via scripts/connectors/tavily.py --answer, proxy-labeled), share-of-voice on a locked competitor panel, and public resonance signals from Bluesky / GDELT / Wikipedia-attention. It sits in the Evaluate phase of the TALE loop and is the resonance-evidence feed for the E dimension — specifically the upstream of the E1 evidence-integrity veto: the proxy-not-Measured discipline, echo-rate-with-declared-method, and AI-answer-perception sub-items (see tale-benchmark.md). It reads the canon lexicon but never edits it, and it never adjudicates a claim.

Scope guard: this skill produces the resonance report only. It does not rebuild share-of-voice tracking (it reuses share-of-voice-tracker — same locked-panel machinery, narrative/message query-term set swapped in), pull own-site GA4/GSC analytics (performance-monitor owns own-property telemetry), compute or cap the NQS (narrative-quality-auditor is the sole gate), design the message tests whose results it later reads (message-test-designer), edit the canon lexicon (narrative-registry is the sole writer of memory/narrative-registry/), or adjudicate a claim (offer-claims-registry). It works one lever — resonance measurement — and hands off.

Quick Start

Measure narrative resonance for [brand] against our canon lexicon. Competitor panel: [list]. Platforms: [Bluesky / news / all keyless].

Run the AI-answer perception check: how do answer engines describe [brand] vs our positioning statement? Use tavily.py --answer and label it proxy.

Compute this quarter's echo rate — overlap of market language with our canon lexicon — and declare the matching method.