review-method
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 8, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONDYNAMIC_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill processes untrusted data from pull request diffs and project source code across multiple specialized auditor agents, creating a potential vector for malicious instructions to influence the review outcome.
- Ingestion points: PR diffs and codebase files are read and processed in
references/pr-review.mdandreferences/team-review.md. - Boundary markers: Markdown headers and code blocks are used for delimitation, but no explicit instructions are provided to agents to ignore potentially malicious embedded content within the analyzed files.
- Capability inventory: The skill can execute shell commands for linting, interact with GitHub via
gh api, and perform automated file modifications and commits via a fix loop. - Sanitization: There is no evidence of content sanitization or escaping before project data is interpolated into auditor prompts.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill orchestrates the execution of several command-line development tools on project files, which could be exploited if filenames are maliciously crafted.
- Evidence:
references/pr-review.mdinstructs the agent to runruff,vulture,npx knip,npx tsc, andgit check-ignoreon identified changed files. - Evidence:
references/code-review-delivery.mddescribes the use ofgh apito post comments and suggestions to GitHub. - [DYNAMIC_EXECUTION]: The review workflow involves tools and sub-processes that may execute code or load dependencies from the project under review.
- Evidence: The use of
npx knipandnpx tscinreferences/pr-review.mdinvolves tools that interact with the project's dependency tree and source code. - Evidence: The fix loop described in
references/code-review-delivery.mdinvolves running project-defined tests to verify fixes before committing them.
Audit Metadata