codex-review-yolo
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jun 19, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHCOMMAND_EXECUTIONCREDENTIALS_UNSAFEDATA_EXFILTRATIONPROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill instructs the agent to run the
codex execcommand. Documentation within the skill (SKILL.md) explicitly states that the required-p yoloprofile operates with adanger-full-accesssandbox, indicating high-privilege access to the host environment. - [CREDENTIALS_UNSAFE]: The skill explicitly directs the agent to load the
.envfile into the shell environment:if [ -f "$REPO_ROOT/.env" ]; then set -a; source "$REPO_ROOT/.env"; set +a; fi. This exposes all secrets stored in the.envfile to thecodexsubprocess and any external services it communicates with. - [DATA_EXFILTRATION]: Given the skill's description of using "gpt-5.4" and a "fast tier" service, the
codextool likely transmits data to a remote LLM provider. Sourcing local secrets from a.envfile into this tool's environment creates a risk that sensitive credentials (like API tokens) will be included in the telemetry or model context sent to external servers. - [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is vulnerable to indirect prompt injection by directing a subprocess to analyze untrusted artifacts without safety constraints.
- Ingestion points: Files, diffs, and documents within the repository as specified in SKILL.md and references/prompt-template.md.
- Boundary markers: Absent. The prompt template does not include delimiters or instructions to ignore commands embedded within the reviewed artifacts.
- Capability inventory: The skill executes
codex execwith host filesystem access and potential network capabilities as part of its reasoning process. - Sanitization: Absent. There is no filtering or validation performed on the artifacts before they are analyzed by the review tool.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata