web-ctf
Audited by Socket on Sep 5, 2026
3 alerts found:
Securityx3SUSPICIOUS: the skill is internally consistent as an offensive web-CTF methodology, but that stated purpose itself gives the agent high-risk penetration-testing capability. There is no strong evidence of malware, hidden exfiltration, or deceptive installer behavior in the text, yet the exploit guidance, tool routing, and credential/secret theft patterns make it unsuitable as a low-risk skill.
The provided artifact is not legitimate dependency source code; it is an attacker-oriented exploit/payload write-up covering multiple SQLi/WAF bypass and an SQLi→SSTI/RCE chain. No concrete executable dependency behavior is demonstrated in this fragment, so direct malware execution/persistence cannot be confirmed. However, if such content is shipped within a published package (as runtime files, install-time scripts, or active assets), it is highly suspicious and should be treated as a potential malicious or weaponized supply-chain concern pending verification of the actual package contents and runtime usage.
The provided fragment is not functional dependency code; it is an offensive security exploitation playbook describing concrete credential/pivot/RCE workflows. No executable malicious behavior, I/O, network activity, or code execution sinks are present in this snippet itself. However, its presence as “code” in a distributed artifact is a serious supply-chain anomaly and suggests malicious inclusion or repository compromise. Additional files (package manifest, build scripts, and other modules) should be reviewed to confirm whether any real runtime malware exists beyond this text.