Code Review

Review $ARGUMENTS thoroughly, covering all dimensions of code quality:

Review Checklist

Correctness

• Does the code do what it's supposed to do?
• Are there edge cases that aren't handled?
• Are there off-by-one errors, null/undefined risks, or race conditions?
• Is error handling correct and complete?

Design

• Is the code at the right level of abstraction?
• Does it follow existing patterns in the codebase?
• Is there unnecessary complexity or over-engineering?
• Are responsibilities clearly separated?
• Could this be simpler?