review-response
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 18, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill accepts untrusted reviewer comments as input to generate response strategies and rebuttal documents. There are no instructions to the agent to treat this data as untrusted or to ignore embedded commands, which could allow a malicious comment to influence the agent's behavior.
- Ingestion points: Reviewer comments (text or file) provided by the user in the 'Usage Steps' section of SKILL.md.
- Boundary markers: Absent; the instructions do not provide delimiters or warnings for the agent to ignore instructions within the ingested text.
- Capability inventory: Drafting structured rebuttal documents and optimizing tone for professionalism.
- Sanitization: Absent; the skill does not specify any validation or filtering of the input comments.
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is configured to read from a local file path (~/.claude/skills/ml-paper-writing/references/knowledge/paper-miner-writing-memory.md) belonging to a different skill to obtain writing context. This cross-skill dependency allows the behavior of the rebuttal generator to be influenced by the contents of a separate, potentially untrusted file.
- Ingestion points: The paper-miner-writing-memory.md file referenced in the 'Integration with active installed writing memory' section of SKILL.md.
- Boundary markers: Absent; the agent is instructed to read this memory directly into its context.
- Capability inventory: Professional writing assistance and rhetorical structure optimization.
- Sanitization: Absent.
Audit Metadata