Make a change more correct by letting one fresh reviewer push back until you both agree.

Steps

Scope the change. Run git status --short. Do not stash, discard or include unrelated files. Find the base: git fetch origin, then git merge-base HEAD origin/<base branch>. Use one diff command for every round.
Write the goal and out-of-scope list in two sentences. Run the covering checks. Do not send code that fails them.
Pick the reviewer: a stronger model if the harness can reach one (subagent with a model setting, team worker, second CLI), or else a fresh DeepSeek context with no history. Record which one.

Send this brief:

Review only. Do not edit, commit, push, comment or start subagents.
Repo: <path>  Base: <sha>  Diff: git diff <sha> [-- <paths>]
Goal: <goal>  Out of scope: <list>  Checks: <results>
Read the code around the diff. Find bugs, broken callers and gaps against the goal.
Flag code the goal does not need. Ignore style unless it hides a bug.
blocker = goal case is wrong. should = real bug users will hit. nit = anything else.
Reply: VERDICT: APPROVE or CHANGES, then one line per finding:
R1 [blocker|should|nit] file:line claim. Fix: suggestion

ds-review-loop

Steps