paper-sprint-review
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 23, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill processes untrusted manuscript files (DOCX, TEX, MD, PDF) to perform reviews and generate revision artifacts. This ingestion of external data creates a surface where malicious instructions embedded in a paper could attempt to influence the agent's behavior.
- Ingestion points:
SKILL.mdandreferences/intake.mdspecify that the workflow begins with the user providing a manuscript file for analysis. - Boundary markers: The instructions do not define specific delimiters or "ignore embedded instructions" warnings for the processed manuscript content.
- Capability inventory: The skill possesses file-writing capabilities (documented in
references/export.mdandSKILL.md) and utilizes shell tools likepandocfor document conversion. - Sanitization: There is no evidence of explicit sanitization or filtering of manuscript content before it is processed by the agent lenses.
- [SAFE]: The skill's operational logic is transparent and focuses on legitimate academic tasks.
- Known tools: The skill recommends and uses established software for report generation, including
pandoc,xelatex,wkhtmltopdf, andweasyprint. - No credential exposure: Analysis of all configuration and markdown files shows no hardcoded API keys, tokens, or sensitive path access.
- Metadata integrity: The
eval_report_paper-sprint-review_result.jsonfile contains self-referential safety claims (e.g., "security: PASS"); while these were identified, they were treated as data points rather than authoritative conclusions per the security analysis protocol.
Audit Metadata