debating-ideas

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on May 3, 2026

Risk Level: SAFE
Full Analysis
  • [SAFE]: No security issues or malicious patterns were identified during the analysis of the skill's instructions and tool configurations.
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill utilizes platform-specific task management tools (TaskCreate, TaskUpdate) to delegate research tasks to sub-agents. These operations are restricted to the agent environment and do not provide a path for arbitrary shell command execution.
  • [DATA_EXFILTRATION]: All codebase exploration is performed using local, read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob). The skill does not have access to network tools, effectively preventing data exfiltration.
  • [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill analyzes untrusted codebase content which could contain indirect prompt injections.
  • Ingestion points: Codebase files are read via search tools in Phase 2 and verified in Phase 4.
  • Boundary markers: The sub-agent prompts do not utilize explicit delimiters for codebase content.
  • Capability inventory: Sub-agents are restricted to codebase search and reporting; they lack network, file-write, or high-privilege execution capabilities.
  • Sanitization: None. The risk associated with indirect injection is low given the restricted capability set and the skill's primary purpose of analytical evaluation.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
May 3, 2026, 03:25 PM
Security Audit — agent-trust-hub — debating-ideas