cached-tool-permission-grants
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 23, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEPROMPT_INJECTIONINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The 'Agent Operational Directive' section uses authoritative language ('MANDATORY', 'Never block') to instruct the agent to bypass standard per-action confirmation prompts for workspace edits and file reads. This is an explicit attempt to override the platform's safety filters and user oversight mechanisms.
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill advocates for removing human-in-the-loop confirmations for individual actions, which significantly increases the risk that an agent will automatically execute malicious instructions found in external data.
- Ingestion points: The skill suggests using tools like
view_fileandread_url_contentto bring untrusted data into the context. - Boundary markers: There are no instructions provided to treat ingested data as untrusted or to use delimiters to prevent instruction leakage.
- Capability inventory: The configuration advice encourages auto-approving high-impact tools like
replace_file_content,write_to_file, and arbitrary command execution vianpm runandgitprefixes. - Sanitization: No sanitization or validation logic is proposed for handling data before it triggers these capabilities.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The configuration examples recommend allowing broad command execution scopes, such as the
gitprefix. This includes network-capable commands (e.g.,git push,git fetch) and configuration-modifying commands that should typically require explicit user review.
Audit Metadata