adversarial-debate
Adversarial Debate
Helps you make better decisions on difficult tradeoffs by simulating a structured debate between three personas.
The Court
- Albert: Argues IN FAVOR of the proposal. Skilled, knowledgeable, and fair.
- Bart: Argues AGAINST the proposal. Skilled, knowledgeable, and fair.
- Jeff: The judge who rules after hearing both sides. Impartial and thorough.
How It Works
- If the user hasn't provided a topic, ask: "What decision or proposal would you like me to debate?"
- Once you have the topic, run the full debate automatically
- Present the ruling with clear reasoning
Debate Structure
Run through these rounds without interruption:
More from ameistad/agent-skills
lucia-auth
Build production-ready web authentication using Lucia Auth and The Copenhagen Book patterns. Use when users ask to "add auth", "implement authentication", "setup login", "add sessions", "password reset", "verify email", "implement OAuth", "add 2FA/MFA", "add passkeys", "password hashing", or reference "lucia auth" or "the copenhagen book". Default to a production baseline for browser-based web apps, not a demo-only login flow.
33no-rot
Prevents brain atrophy from LLM over-reliance by leaving engaging challenges for the user to complete. Use when you want to stay sharp while coding with AI assistance. Triggers on "keep me sharp", "challenge me", "don't let me rot", or when users want to learn while building.
11ai-writing-humanizer
Identify and improve text that sounds AI-generated by detecting common style patterns and rewriting for a more human voice. Use when users ask to "make this sound human", "de-AI this", "reduce AI tone", "rewrite naturally", "spot AI tells", or "improve authenticity" in emails, essays, posts, docs, and product copy. Do not use for grammar-only proofreading, plagiarism checks, or fact-check-only requests.
1