Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the decision tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.

Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing. Asking multiple questions at once is bewildering.

If a fact can be found by exploring the environment (filesystem, tools, etc.), look it up rather than asking me. The decisions, though, are mine — put each one to me and wait for my answer.

Do not act on it until I confirm we have reached a shared understanding.

Step 0 — Ask for grill depth before grilling

Before the first real question, ask the user which depth to run at. Default is deep (deepest). Offer the three options with a one-line description each, plus a one-shot invocation shortcut for next time:

Grill depth? (default: deep)

deep — walk every branch of the decision tree, critical + edge + corner cases, cross-reference assertions against code / docs / prior decisions, invent boundary scenarios, surface contradictions hard. Unbounded until shared understanding.

standard — critical assumptions + main edge cases + obvious cross-references. Skip exotic corner cases. ~15–25 questions or until major branches are resolved.

quick — top 5 highest-leverage hard-hitters only. Deal-breaker assumptions and dead-on-arrival risks. ~5–10 questions. Triage, not full coverage.

Reply with deep / standard / quick (or just hit return for deep). You can also pre-select next time with /grill-me deep, /grill-me standard, or /grill-me quick — aliases 3 / 2 / 1 and deepest / medium / sharp also work.