code-review

Two-axis review of the diff between HEAD and a fixed point the caller supplies:

• Standards — does the code conform to this repo's documented coding standards?
• Spec — does the code faithfully implement the originating issue / spec?

Both axes run as parallel sub-agents so they don't pollute each other's context, then this skill aggregates their findings.

Generic callers keep this behavior and output unchanged. When an AND caller supplies both a delivery-unit identity and the complete Spec authority set, load review-attestation.md and use its conditional attestation mode. That mode adds evidence binding to the ordinary reports; it does not rename this skill or make the AND package a generic review priority.

Process

1. Pin the fixed point

Whatever the caller supplied is the fixed point — a commit SHA, branch name, tag, main, HEAD~5, etc. If none was supplied, ask for it.