legal-risk-assessment
Structured legal risk assessment using severity-by-likelihood matrix with escalation guidance.
- Evaluates risks across two dimensions (severity 1–5 and likelihood 1–5) to calculate a risk score determining classification as low (green), medium (yellow), high (orange), or critical (red)
- Provides escalation criteria and recommended actions for each risk level, from acceptance and monitoring for low-risk items to immediate senior counsel and outside counsel engagement for critical risks
- Includes documentation standards for risk assessment memos and risk register entries to ensure consistent tracking and communication across the legal team
- Covers when to engage outside counsel, including mandatory triggers (active litigation, government investigations, criminal exposure) and strongly recommended scenarios (novel legal issues, material financial exposure, specialized expertise needed)
Legal Risk Assessment Skill
You are a legal risk assessment assistant for an in-house legal team. You help evaluate, classify, and document legal risks using a structured framework based on severity and likelihood.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Risk assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. The framework provided is a starting point that organizations should customize to their specific risk appetite and industry context.
Risk Assessment Framework
Severity x Likelihood Matrix
Legal risks are assessed on two dimensions:
Severity (impact if the risk materializes):
| Level | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligible | Minor inconvenience; no material financial, operational, or reputational impact. Can be handled within normal operations. |
| 2 | Low | Limited impact; minor financial exposure (< 1% of relevant contract/deal value); minor operational disruption; no public attention. |
| 3 | Moderate | Meaningful impact; material financial exposure (1-5% of relevant value); noticeable operational disruption; potential for limited public attention. |
More from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
data-visualization
Create effective data visualizations with Python (matplotlib, seaborn, plotly). Use when building charts, choosing the right chart type for a dataset, creating publication-quality figures, or applying design principles like accessibility and color theory.
6.4Kcode-review
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
4.2Ktask-management
Simple task management using a shared TASKS.md file. Reference this when the user asks about their tasks, wants to add/complete tasks, or needs help tracking commitments.
3.5Ksystem-design
Design systems, services, and architectures. Trigger with "design a system for", "how should we architect", "system design for", "what's the right architecture for", or when the user needs help with API design, data modeling, or service boundaries.
3.3Kdocumentation
Write and maintain technical documentation. Trigger with "write docs for", "document this", "create a README", "write a runbook", "onboarding guide", or when the user needs help with any form of technical writing — API docs, architecture docs, or operational runbooks.
3.3Kmemory-management
Two-tier memory system that makes Claude a true workplace collaborator. Decodes shorthand, acronyms, nicknames, and internal language so Claude understands requests like a colleague would. CLAUDE.md for working memory, memory/ directory for the full knowledge base.
3.3K