skills/apocohq/skills/review-work/Gen Agent Trust Hub

review-work

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Mar 29, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEPROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
  • [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The template in references/code-reviewer.md incorporates several placeholders like {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} and {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} directly into the subagent's instructions. If these fields are populated with data from untrusted sources, such as a malicious pull request or external requirement document, they could be used to perform indirect prompt injection to steer the reviewer's assessment.
  • Ingestion points: SKILL.md and references/code-reviewer.md (placeholders {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}, {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}, {BASE_SHA}, {HEAD_SHA}, {DESCRIPTION})
  • Boundary markers: None provided in the template to separate instructions from external data.
  • Capability inventory: Shell execution (git diff) and file reading across all files in the diff range.
  • Sanitization: No validation or escaping is applied to the interpolated content.
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The subagent is instructed to execute shell commands (git diff {BASE_SHA}..{HEAD_SHA}) where the arguments are provided via placeholders. Without proper sanitization or validation of the commit SHAs, there is a theoretical risk of command injection if an attacker can influence the values used for these variables (e.g., through maliciously named branches or tags containing shell metacharacters).
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Mar 29, 2026, 02:10 PM
Security Audit — agent-trust-hub — review-work