WITH claimed AS ( SELECT id FROM jobs WHERE status = 'pending' AND run_at <= now() ORDER BY priority DESC, run_at FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED LIMIT 10 ) UPDATE jobs SET status = 'running', started_at = now(), attempts = attempts + 1 FROM claimed WHERE jobs.id = claimed.id RETURNING jobs.*;

-- process the jobs

COMMIT;


Properties:

- Exactly one worker claims each job, guaranteed by row locks.
- Workers never block each other, which is what `SKIP LOCKED` buys.
- A crashed worker's transaction rolls back and its jobs return to `pending` automatically. Committing the claim before processing instead requires a reaper for stuck rows.
- The job and the business data commit together, which is the main reason to keep the queue in the database.

### The index

```sql
CREATE INDEX ON jobs (priority DESC, run_at) WHERE status = 'pending';

Partial, because in a healthy queue 99.9% of rows are done and a full index would be dead weight. See index-design.

Bloat is the real operational cost

A queue table is the highest-churn table in the system: every job inserted, updated two or three times, then deleted. Under default autovacuum settings it bloats and claim latency creeps up over weeks.

ALTER TABLE jobs SET (
  autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.01,
  autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 0,
  fillfactor = 70                        -- room for HOT updates
);

Delete completed jobs promptly, moving them to an archive table or dropping a partition. A jobs table retaining history is a bloat generator. See mvcc-and-bloat.

Operational details

Do not poll tightly. Poll about once a second with jitter, or use LISTEN/NOTIFY to wake workers with polling as fallback. LISTEN needs a dedicated connection and does not work through a transaction pooler, see connection-pooling.
Batch the claim to amortize round trips, but only when a worker can process the whole batch within its visibility window.

Add a reaper when committing the claim before processing:

UPDATE jobs SET status = 'pending'
WHERE status = 'running' AND started_at < now() - interval '10 minutes';

Cap attempts and use a dead-letter status. A job failing forever at full speed is a self-inflicted denial of service. Back off exponentially with jitter, see retry-amplification.
Make handlers idempotent. At-least-once is the guarantee, since a worker can die after doing the work and before committing.

When to use a broker instead

A database queue is the right default to roughly thousands of jobs per second: one less system, and transactional consistency with the data, which SQS and Kafka cannot provide. Move to a broker for fan-out to many independent consumers, very high throughput, long retention and replay, or cross-datacenter delivery.

Existing implementations: pgmq, River (Go), Oban (Elixir), Solid Queue (Rails), graphile-worker (Node), Procrastinate (Python).

Part 2: the dual-write problem

db.commit()                      # 1. save the order
queue.publish(OrderCreated(...)) # 2. tell everyone

These cannot be made atomic. Three real failure modes:

Crash between 1 and 2: the order exists and nobody hears about it, causing silent divergence.
Publish succeeds, transaction rolls back: consumers act on an order that does not exist.
Publish succeeds, commit fails on retry: duplicate events.

Reversing the order does not help. Two-phase commit introduces its own blocking failure mode and most brokers do not support it.

Transactional outbox

Write the event to the same database in the same transaction, and relay it separately.

CREATE TABLE outbox (
  id           bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
  aggregate_id text        NOT NULL,
  event_type   text        NOT NULL,
  payload      jsonb       NOT NULL,
  created_at   timestamptz NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
  published_at timestamptz
);
CREATE INDEX ON outbox (id) WHERE published_at IS NULL;

with db.transaction():
    db.insert(order)
    db.insert_outbox(event_type="OrderCreated", payload=..., aggregate_id=order.id)
# both rows or neither

The relay uses the same SKIP LOCKED pattern:

BEGIN;
SELECT * FROM outbox WHERE published_at IS NULL
ORDER BY id FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED LIMIT 100;
-- publish to the broker
UPDATE outbox SET published_at = now() WHERE id = ANY($1);
COMMIT;

What this guarantees and does not:

Guaranteed: if the order exists, the event is eventually published. Atomicity restored.
Not guaranteed: exactly-once delivery. A relay crashing after publishing but before the UPDATE publishes twice. Consumers must be idempotent, deduplicating on event id. At-least-once plus idempotent consumers is the achievable target, exactly-once delivery is not.
Ordering is per-aggregate at best. Publish in id order and partition the broker by aggregate_id when consumers need per-entity ordering.

CDC as the relay

Debezium reads the Postgres WAL and publishes changes, removing polling load. Costs: another system, and an inactive replication slot pins WAL and fills the disk, see mvcc-and-bloat. Polling the outbox is simpler and adequate for most systems.

The inbox

The mirror image on the consumer side, which is what makes idempotency concrete:

INSERT INTO processed_events (event_id) VALUES ($1);   -- unique violation means already handled

Same transaction as the side effect, so doing the work and recording it cannot diverge. Prune rows on a window longer than the broker's maximum redelivery period.

Delete or partition published outbox rows on a schedule, since the table otherwise grows forever.

database-queues

Queues in the database

Part 1: SKIP LOCKED job queues