A committed aesthetic beats a catalogue

The problem this exists for

ui-ux-pro-max ships 84 styles, 161 palettes and 57 font pairings, and design-advisor is wired to all of it. The catalogue is not the bottleneck.

The bottleneck is that a catalogue lets a model pick, and an unconstrained pick is the modal one. Asked for a landing page with no brand, any model reaches for the same safe centre: a soft gradient, a large sans heading, three rounded cards with a left accent border, generous neutral grey. Every input in the training distribution votes for it. Nothing in a catalogue entry saying "Swiss minimalism — clean, grid-based, generous whitespace" is specific enough to override that, because that sentence describes the safe centre too.

Compare a rule from a committed aesthetic:

every dimension is calc(fraction * 100vw) against a baseline width, so one page at 1024px reads as a perfect scaled-down of the same page at 1920px