code-agent

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 9, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONDYNAMIC_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
  • [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to process potentially untrusted external data, which creates a vulnerability surface where malicious instructions could be embedded in the data being analyzed.
  • Ingestion points: SKILL.md explicitly mentions processing user-uploaded files (e.g., 'Unzip the uploaded my-project.zip') and delegating tasks from GitHub issues or bug reports.
  • Capability inventory: The agent possesses the capability to read, write, and execute code within its workspace environment.
  • Boundary markers: The instructions in DESIGN.md and IMPLEMENT.md attempt to mitigate risk by advising the orchestrator to define explicit scope boundaries and clear acceptance criteria.
  • Sanitization: No explicit content sanitization is mentioned, though the skill relies on an isolated container as a primary security control.
  • [DYNAMIC_EXECUTION]: The skill's primary purpose is the autonomous generation and execution of code.
  • Evidence: SKILL.md and IMPLEMENT.md describe a workflow where the agent explores the codebase, implements solutions, and runs test suites to verify its own work.
  • Context: This behavior is the intended primary purpose of the skill and is constrained to a dedicated, isolated container session as described in the execution environment section.
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The agent is instructed to run shell commands and development tools to perform its tasks.
  • Evidence: IMPLEMENT.md and REVIEW.md contain instructions for the agent to run test suites (e.g., pytest, mypy) and report the results.
  • Context: Command execution is scoped to the agent's workspace and is used for implementation verification and codebase exploration.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Oct 9, 2026, 12:35 AM