why
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Aug 20, 2026
Risk Level: SAFECOMMAND_EXECUTIONPROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill performs local shell operations using
git blame,git log, and the GitHub CLI (gh pr view) to establish a code anchor and retrieve historical metadata from the repository. - [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is susceptible to indirect prompt injection due to its architecture of ingesting and processing untrusted data from multiple external sources.
- Ingestion points: Data is pulled from MCP-connected services including Slack, Notion, Linear, Sentry, Datadog, and Databricks (found in
SKILL.mdandreferences/source-playbook.md). - Boundary markers: There are no explicit delimiters or specific instructions for subagents to ignore potentially malicious instructions embedded in external chat messages, PR comments, or ticket descriptions.
- Capability inventory: Subagents are granted tool-use capabilities (
readonly: false) and the main agent has shell command access. - Sanitization: There is no evidence of filtering or escaping logic applied to the external content before it is processed by the LLM subagents.
- [SAFE]: The skill's access to sensitive organizational data (infrastructure metrics, team chat, design documents) is strictly aligned with its primary purpose as an archaeology and research tool. The prompts in
references/epistemics.mdandreferences/synthesizer-prompt.mdenforce high standards for evidence-based reasoning, citation verification, and the preservation of uncertainty, which serve as functional guardrails against confident storytelling or rationalization.
Audit Metadata