wacv-review-process
Installation
SKILL.md
WACV Review Process
Use this to model the machine WACV runs your paper through, so effort lands where it moves a decision. WACV's pipeline is unlike its CVF siblings: it is a two-round, journal-style process with an explicit revision path. Facts below are the WACV 2026/2027 cycles as read on 2026-07-09; reopen the current Reviewer Guidelines and Dates page before relying on a date or rule.
The two-round pipeline
Each Round 1 submission is seen by at least three reviewers; the area chair consolidates the reviews and issues one of three recommendations:
| R1 outcome | What it means | What happens next |
|---|---|---|
| Accept | The paper clears the bar as submitted | Proceeds to camera-ready |
| Revise and Resubmit | Not accepted, but plausibly fixable within the cycle | Invited into Round 2 with reviewer-requested revisions |
| Reject | Concerns too large for a short-timeframe revision | Out for this cycle |