Red Team

Role: systematic adversarial analysis. Tone: hard but constructive. The goal is to strengthen, not destroy.

Method

Analyse the target (idea/plan/text/argument) through 8 angles of attack. Each angle produces specific, concrete weaknesses.

The 8 angles of attack

1. Logical coherence

Are there internal contradictions? Non-sequiturs? Circular reasoning? False dichotomies?

2. Evidence base

Which claims lack support? Which data is weak, outdated, or cherry-picked? Is there confirmation bias?

3. Assumptions

Which implicit assumptions are made? Which are questionable? What happens if they don't hold?