Skill(skill="team-review", args="task description")
                    |
         SKILL.md (this file) = Router
                    |
     +--------------+--------------+
     |                             |
  no --role flag              --role <name>
     |                             |
  Coordinator                  Worker
  roles/coordinator/role.md    roles/<name>/role.md
     |
     +-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
                                    |
                    +-------+-------+-------+
                    v       v       v
                [scan]  [review]  [fix]
                team-worker agents, each loads roles/<role>/role.md

Role Registry

Role	Path	Prefix	Inner Loop
coordinator	roles/coordinator/role.md	—	—
scanner	roles/scanner/role.md	SCAN-*	false
reviewer	roles/reviewer/role.md	REV-*	false
fixer	roles/fixer/role.md	FIX-*	true

Role Router

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

Has --role <name> -> Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4
No --role -> @roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router

Shared Constants

Session prefix: RV
Session path: .workflow/.team/RV-<slug>-<date>/
Team name: review
CLI tools: maestro delegate --mode analysis (read-only), maestro delegate --mode write (modifications)
Message bus: mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)

Worker Spawn Template

Coordinator spawns workers using this template:

Agent({
  subagent_type: "team-worker",
  description: "Spawn <role> worker",
  team_name: "review",
  name: "<role>",
  run_in_background: true,
  prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: review
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>

## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.

Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})

User Commands

Command	Action
`check` / `status`	View pipeline status graph
`resume` / `continue`	Advance to next step
`--full`	Enable scan + review + fix pipeline
`--fix`	Fix-only mode (skip scan/review)
`-q` / `--quick`	Quick scan only
`--dimensions=sec,cor,prf,mnt`	Custom dimensions
`-y` / `--yes`	Skip confirmations

Completion Action

When pipeline completes, coordinator presents:

AskUserQuestion({
  questions: [{
    question: "Review pipeline complete. What would you like to do?",
    header: "Completion",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Archive & Clean (Recommended)", description: "Archive session, clean up team" },
      { label: "Keep Active", description: "Keep session for follow-up work" },
      { label: "Export Results", description: "Export deliverables to target directory" }
    ]
  }]
})

Session Directory

.workflow/.team/RV-<slug>-<date>/
├── .msg/messages.jsonl     # Team message bus
├── .msg/meta.json          # Session state + cross-role state
├── wisdom/                 # Cross-task knowledge
├── scan/                   # Scanner output
├── review/                 # Reviewer output
└── fix/                    # Fixer output

Specs Reference

specs/pipelines.md — Pipeline definitions and task registry
specs/dimensions.md — Review dimension definitions (SEC/COR/PRF/MNT)
specs/finding-schema.json — Finding data schema
specs/team-config.json — Team configuration

Error Handling

Scenario	Resolution
Unknown --role value	Error with available role list
Role not found	Error with expected path (roles//role.md)
CLI tool fails	Worker fallback to direct implementation
Scanner finds 0 findings	Report clean, skip review + fix
User declines fix	Delete FIX tasks, complete with review-only results
Fast-advance conflict	Coordinator reconciles on next callback
Completion action fails	Default to Keep Active

team-review

Team Review

Architecture