conventional-commit-rewrite
Conventional Commit Rewrite
Overview
Rewrites non-Conformant commit subjects in recent history into Conventional Commits format. Destructive — changes commit SHAs. Refuses to silently rewrite already-pushed commits; instead presents a 3-option menu (Cancel / Force-push / Branch-based).
Announce at start: "I'm using the conventional-commit-rewrite skill to rewrite these commit messages."
Workflow
Before starting, Read the main conventional-commit SKILL.md at <plugin-root>/skills/conventional-commit/SKILL.md — the safety check details, regex, "Mapping Common Non-Conformant Patterns" table, in-place / branch-based rewrite scripts, and post-rewrite cleanup commands all live there. The variant relies on those sections.
Then follow ## Workflow: /conventional-commit-rewrite in the main SKILL.md exactly. Steps:
More from chann/skills
code-review
Use when the user asks to review code, review changes, review a commit, review a PR, audit code quality, check for security issues, or generate a code review report. Trigger on phrases like "review my changes", "코드 리뷰", "check my code", "review the last commit", "what do you think of this diff", "compare branches", "code audit" — even if they don't say "code review" explicitly. For persistent file output use `code-review-md` (markdown) or `code-review-html` (markdown + HTML).
10code-review-md
Use when the user asks to save a code review to a file, write a markdown review report, persist review findings, or generate a review file in `.reviews/`. Trigger on phrases like "review my changes and save", "write the code review", "리뷰 결과 파일로 저장", "마크다운 리뷰 보고서", "/code-review-md". For interactive (no-file) review use the `code-review` skill; for HTML output use `code-review-html`.
8code-review-html
Use when the user asks for a styled HTML code review report, a browser-readable review, or both markdown + HTML output. Trigger on phrases like "/code-review-html", "HTML 리뷰 보고서", "styled review report", "review with badges/sidebar". For markdown-only output use `code-review-md`; for in-conversation review use `code-review`.
8long-task
Use when the user asks to build a project end-to-end, run autonomous multi-hour or multi-day development, or orchestrate multi-milestone work without human intervention. Trigger phrases include "build this whole project", "implement this end-to-end", "do this autonomously", "run a long task", "long-running agent", "build it from scratch and don't ask", or the explicit `/long-task` command. Also use for lifecycle subcommands such as `/long-task status`, `/long-task pause`, `/long-task resume`, `/long-task clear`, and `/long-task complete`.
5git-commit
Use when the user asks to commit changes, organize commits, write commit messages, or split working-tree changes into Conventional Commits. Trigger on phrases like "commit my changes", "커밋해줘", "커밋 분리", "make commits", "/git-commit", or whenever the user wants to turn current changes into Conventional Commit-style commits. For commit + push use `git-commit-push`; for rewriting non-Conventional commit history use `git-commit-rewrite`.
5git-commit-push
Use when the user asks to commit working-tree changes AND push to the remote. Trigger on phrases like "commit and push", "커밋하고 푸시해줘", "/git-commit-push", "push my commits". Runs the git-commit workflow, then `git push` (never `--force`). For commit-only use `git-commit`; for history rewrite use `git-commit-rewrite`.
5