postmortem
Postmortem
An incident happened. Understand why, document it properly, and make it harder to repeat. No hand-waving, no minimizing.
Why This Exists
Bad postmortems dismiss ("no actual impact"), deflect ("edge case"), or rush ("wrong command, fixed it, moving on"). These teach nothing.
A good postmortem makes the reader feel the weight of what could have gone wrong, traces the failure to its root, and produces concrete changes. It's a document you'd send to your team lead without embarrassment.
On Activation
Write the postmortem. Don't ask clarifying questions unless the incident is genuinely ambiguous — you usually have full context
More from corygabrielsen/skills
mission-control
Coordinate complex multi-step work using task graphs and parallel background agents. Use when work requires decomposition, delegation, and long-running operations that may survive context compaction.
11loop-codex-review
Automated code review loop with progressive reasoning levels. Runs n parallel Codex reviews (configurable via -n), Claude addresses issues, climbs from low→xhigh reasoning until fixed point (all n clean). Human approval at each iteration.
11review-pr
Thorough, educational PR review process. Gathers context, explains changes, identifies issues systematically, and drafts constructive feedback collaboratively before submitting.
11orthogonalize-pr
Identify and separate orthogonal (independent) change sets within a decomposed PR. Creates branches for each set that could theoretically be reviewed or merged separately.
10decontextualize
Course-correct when artifacts overfit to conversation context. Invoke when examples, names, or language are too specific to current work.
10loop-review-skill-until-fixed-point
Iterate /review-skill on a target until fixed point. Runs review passes until all reviewers return NO ISSUES.
9