Review RemNote flashcards

Review what the learner will actually see during practice, including the parent-bullet context and card direction. Focus on changes that improve recall or factual accuracy:

• Is the answer supported by the source, correct, and sufficiently precise?
• Does one prompt test one useful retrieval task, with a clear expected answer?
• Does the parent context or Cloze sentence reveal the answer or leave the question ambiguous?
• For a two-way card, is the reverse direction independently useful and unambiguous?
• Does a hint clarify the target without supplying it? If a card remains difficult, consider rewriting or splitting it instead of adding more hints.
• Does a Set or List card ask for a manageable group whose complete recall or order matters?
• Are near-duplicates intentional reinforcement or redundant cards? If access to the existing RemNote base is available, search it before claiming a card is new.
• For code cards, is the code placed where it will be visible on the intended side of the card?

Return actionable findings tied to specific cards, with a suggested revision when useful. Preserve good cards and the author's learning goals. If the user asked for a revised deck, provide the corrected cards in their requested format; otherwise report findings without changing the source. Write to RemNote only when the destination and requested change are clear, and verify the result through the connected tool if one is used.

A sample review is in examples.md.

Sources: Creating Flashcards, Effective Hints, Multi-Line Cards.