team-code-review

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 22, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONDYNAMIC_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
  • [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill processes untrusted external data, specifically repository source code and pull requests, which could contain malicious or misleading instructions.\n
  • Ingestion points: The coordinator agent reads diffs, PR metadata, and surrounding code as defined in SKILL.md (Step 1).\n
  • Capability inventory: The skill utilizes the herdr CLI for environment management and agent coordination.\n
  • Boundary markers: Instructions enforce a read-only constraint and a specific coordinator marker (TEAM_CODE_REVIEW_COORDINATOR=1) to prevent recursive execution.\n
  • Sanitization: A dedicated verification phase (Step 3) requires the main agent to independently reproduce and verify all specialist findings, mitigating the risk of following instructions embedded in the analyzed code.\n- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill uses the herdr CLI to orchestrate the review workspace.\n
  • Evidence: references/herdr.md lists commands for pane management (herdr pane split), agent discovery (herdr agent get), and cross-pane communication (herdr agent prompt). These are used for internal coordination rather than executing arbitrary external scripts.\n- [DYNAMIC_EXECUTION]: The skill dynamically generates prompts for delegated agents at runtime.\n
  • Evidence: The coordinator constructs self-contained prompt strings incorporating dynamic environment variables, pane IDs, and repository paths to drive the multi-agent review logic.\n- [SAFE]: The skill promotes standard industry security and testing practices for application audits.\n
  • Evidence: references/rails.md recommends using established tools such as Brakeman for security scanning and RSpec for behavioral verification, which are standard developer tools for ensuring code quality.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Sep 22, 2026, 12:58 AM