thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
Thermo-Nuclear Code Quality Review
Use this skill only when the user explicitly requests this review mode. It focuses on implementation quality, maintainability, abstraction quality, and codebase health.
Treat the audit as read-only by default. Establish the intended comparison range, inspect repository instructions, and report prioritized findings with file-and-line evidence. Edit code only when the user separately asks for implementation.
Above all, this skill should push the reviewer to be ambitious about code structure. Do not merely identify local cleanup opportunities. Actively search for "code judo" moves: restructurings that preserve behavior while making the implementation dramatically simpler, smaller, more direct, and more elegant.
Core Prompt
Start from this baseline:
Perform a deep code quality audit of the current branch's changes. Rethink how to structure / implement the changes to meaningfully improve code quality without impacting behavior. Work to improve abstractions, modularity, reduce Spaghetti code, improve succinctness and legibility. Be ambitious, if there is a clear path to improving the implementation that involves restructuring some of the codebase, go for it. Be extremely thorough and rigorous. Measure twice, cut once.