finetuning

Installation
SKILL.md

Finetuning

Priors, not rules. Only firm guardrails: held-out eval you never train on, no leakage, trust evo's recorded numbers over the run's self-report. Override anything else against the gate.

Pick the technique by reward shape

Decide on the reward first, technique second. Choosing the comfortable technique over the matching one is the most common failure.

Reward shape Technique
Verifiable (exact match, unit tests, parser-decidable) RL (GRPO / RLOO / PPO) — reward includes format, so the model learns to emit verifier-acceptable shape
Preference pairs (chosen vs rejected) DPO / KTO / ORPO — cheaper than full RL, no rollouts
Demonstrations only (curated traces, chat data) SFT — install format/tone/capability the base lacks
Have a scorer + want SFT stability RFT — sample, filter by reward, SFT on survivors

"SFT-then-RL" is not a law. For a competent base model on a verifiable benchmark, RL-from-base often beats SFT-then-RL end-to-end.

Research the literature before the first commit

Installs
40
Repository
evo-hq/evo
GitHub Stars
1.3K
First Seen
Jun 1, 2026
finetuning — evo-hq/evo