Extension Audit Methodology
Extension Audit Methodology
Find quality issues standard code review misses — before release, not after deployment.
Pattern Overview
A systematic 5-dimension audit framework for VS Code extensions to identify code quality issues beyond standard linting. Produces actionable recommendations with evidence-based prioritization.
Problem Solved: Standard code review catches logic bugs and style issues, but misses extension-specific quality problems like orphaned commands, blocking I/O in UI threads, debug noise in production, and leftover dependencies from removed features.
When to Use:
- Before major release (milestone versions)
- After significant refactoring
- When performance degradation suspected
- Post-feature-removal cleanup
Time Investment: 2-4 hours for comprehensive audit + 4-8 hours remediation
More from fabioc-aloha/lithium
bicep avm mastery
Azure Verified Modules (AVM), Bicep best practices, and MCP-powered infrastructure as code for Azure
9brain qa
Semantic, logic, code, and architectural validation of Alex's cognitive architecture — not just file counts, but meaning coherence
1infrastructure as code skill
**Domain**: DevOps & Cloud Engineering
1skill-activation
Internal metacognitive skill for automatic capability discovery — self-triggers when uncertain about available skills
1dream-state
Neural maintenance, synapse validation, automated health diagnostics, and unconscious processing
1ui/ux design
User interface design, user experience optimization, accessibility compliance, design systems
1