simplicity-review

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 27, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONPROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
  • [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to ingest and analyze untrusted external data, including git diffs, linked issues, and parent specifications.
  • Ingestion points: The skill reads output from git diff, linked issues, and parent specifications mentioned in the contract.
  • Boundary markers: No explicit delimiters or instructions to ignore embedded commands within the processed data are provided to the agent.
  • Capability inventory: The skill executes shell commands (git fetch, git diff, git status) and suggests performing type-checks and running tests on temporary files.
  • Sanitization: There is no mention of sanitizing or escaping the content of the diffs or issues before processing.
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill explicitly instructs the agent to execute shell commands to interact with the version control system and validate code changes.
  • Evidence: Instructions to run git fetch origin <base>, git diff, and git status to determine the scope of the review.
  • Evidence: The requirement to "type-check a scratch file" and ensure a "cut test suite still goes red against the old code" implies the execution of external tools like compilers, linters, or test runners (e.g., tsc, jest, pytest).
  • [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The instructions contain logic that could lead to the degradation of security posture in the target codebase by encouraging the removal of defensive code.
  • Evidence: The skill defines a "cut" category (ask:) that includes "A guard against a speculative or vanishingly unlikely race or security edge case". This instructs the agent to flag and potentially recommend the removal of security-related code if it perceives the threat as unlikely, which could lead to the introduction of vulnerabilities if the agent's assessment is incorrect.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Oct 27, 2026, 04:46 PM