kamal-deployment

Warn

Audited by Socket on Sep 18, 2026

4 alerts found:

Anomalyx4
AnomalyLOW
examples.md

No clear malicious behavior is present in the supplied fragment. The configurations implement expected Kamal deployment, backup, and provisioning functionality. Security risks exist: unrestricted passwordless sudo, direct Redis secret interpolation into a command line, unescaped shell construction using configuration data, broad SSH exposure, and mutable third-party image tags. Pin images by digest, validate and shell-escape configuration values, avoid command-line secrets, restrict SSH access, and use least-privilege provisioning. The backup and restore paths should be reviewed and the backup image trusted or independently audited.

Confidence: 97%Severity: 68%
AnomalyLOW
server-hardening.md

The fragment is legitimate server-hardening documentation and shows no evidence of malware, data exfiltration, obfuscation, or backdoor behavior. It carries moderate operational security risk because it grants unrestricted passwordless sudo to the deploy user, uses brittle SSH configuration edits, and may leave Docker-published ports outside UFW control. Commands should be validated, least privilege applied, and cloud firewall rules used before production deployment.

Confidence: 98%Severity: 58%
AnomalyLOW
cicd.md

No direct malware or intentional data theft is evident in the supplied configuration. The workflow has material supply-chain security risk because deployment executes repository-controlled code with SSH and production secrets, third-party actions are referenced by mutable tags, and registry caching and mutable image tags require strict access controls. Pin actions to full commit SHAs, restrict protected-branch deployment permissions, validate dynamic service and host values, minimize secret exposure, protect registry cache/image tags, and avoid writing passphrases to disk where possible.

Confidence: 94%Severity: 67%
AnomalyLOW
logging.md

The fragment is legitimate logging and monitoring configuration with no clear evidence of malware or intentional sabotage. The main risks are privileged Docker socket access, use of the mutable latest image tag, and possible external disclosure of sensitive application logs to Honeybadger. Pin the Vector image by immutable digest, restrict socket exposure where possible, sanitize logs, and protect the API key through a managed secret mechanism.

Confidence: 98%Severity: 58%
Audit Metadata
Analyzed At
Sep 18, 2026, 10:09 PM
Package URL
pkg:socket/skills-sh/faqndo97%2Fai-skills%2Fkamal-deployment%2F@c7b71bc28d6d7f59376f3e1caf0086d5fc4182dda34429c33d30e535c3f7e144