doc-review
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 20, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHDATA_EXFILTRATIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONDYNAMIC_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [DATA_EXFILTRATION]: The skill hardcodes absolute file paths to a specific user's directory (
C:\Users\ffrol\.claude\projects\C--development-github-gflow-cli\memory\). This constitutes local data exposure, revealing sensitive user environment details and system structure. Access to these 'memory' files allows for the harvesting of project-specific context and potentially sensitive history. - [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill uses various shell commands (
grep,tail,git log) and executes local Python scripts usinguv run(e.g.,scripts/ci/check_doc_links.py,scripts/ci/generate_website_docs.py). These capabilities allow for local code execution based on the repository's content and script state. - [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill implements an 'LLM council audit' that ingests numerous project files to generate review verdicts, creating a significant attack surface.
- Ingestion points: Processes
README.md,llms.txt,AGENTS.md, and all files in thedocs/directory. - Boundary markers: No explicit delimiters or instructions are used to distinguish documentation content from agent instructions during the audit.
- Capability inventory: The skill possesses the ability to execute shell commands and write to the filesystem.
- Sanitization: There is no evidence of sanitization or validation of the documentation content before it is passed to the AI sub-agents.
- [DYNAMIC_EXECUTION]: The skill instructions provide a fallback to create a Python script (
scripts/ci/check_doc_links.py) if missing and then execute it. Runtime code generation and execution represent a high-risk capability that can be exploited if the source instructions are compromised.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata