pre-submission-report
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Aug 24, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHCOMMAND_EXECUTIONPROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The orchestrator assembles and executes shell commands using
evalbased on data parsed from sub-agent responses. - Evidence: The line
eval bash <skills-root>/_shared/review-state-log.sh "$ARGS" ...inSKILL.mdexecutes a shell script with arguments derived from a sub-agent's return. - Risk: The
$ARGSvariable is populated by parsing a sub-agent's response usingparse-stamp-directive.sh. Since sub-agents process untrusted external documents (research papers), a sophisticated attacker could embed instructions within a LaTeX or BibTeX file that manipulate a sub-agent's output. This could inject malicious shell arguments into$ARGS, leading to arbitrary command execution when the string is evaluated by the orchestrator shell. - [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill provides an attack surface for indirect prompt injection by processing untrusted paper artifacts and passing them to 13 autonomous sub-agents.
- Ingestion points:
SKILL.mdidentifies.tex,.bib, and.logfiles as input sources for the review process. - Boundary markers: The skill does not define strict delimiters or instructions to sub-agents to ignore potentially malicious commands embedded in the document text.
- Capability inventory: The orchestrator possesses broad capabilities including shell command execution (
latexmk,mkdir,uv), file system access, and the ability to dispatch multiple agents with varying capabilities. - Sanitization: While the skill implements a spot-verification step to confirm that findings are grounded in the text, it lacks sanitization of the extracted data before it is used to populate variables for further shell execution.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata