After /ship completes a sprint
After fixing a bug that took significant investigation
After making an architecture decision worth remembering
After discovering a pattern that should be reused

Process

1. Read the sprint artifacts

Resolve all sprint phase artifacts in one call:

~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/resolve.sh compound

The output is JSON with upstream_artifacts containing paths for think, plan, review, security, qa, and ship artifacts (only those that exist within the last 2 days). Read what's available. Focus on:

/review findings that were fixed (these are bugs worth documenting)
/security findings that were resolved (these are patterns worth remembering)
/think scope decisions (these are decisions worth recording)
/qa failures that were debugged (these are bugs with investigation trails)

Report-only ship check. Read the ship artifact's run_mode. If it is "report_only", /ship only previewed the delivery and nothing was published (no commit, no PR, no deploy). Tell the user plainly that the ship was report-only, then keep going: the investigation from /review, /security, and /qa is still worth capturing if it was non-trivial. But do not write a solution or summary that claims work was shipped or that the sprint closed. There is no shipment to record yet.

SHIP_ARTIFACT=$(~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/resolve.sh compound 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.upstream_artifacts.ship // empty')
SHIP_RUN_MODE=$(jq -r '.run_mode // "normal"' "$SHIP_ARTIFACT" 2>/dev/null || echo "normal")

2. Identify what's worth capturing

Not everything needs a solution document. Capture:

Bugs that took more than a trivial fix (the investigation is the value)
Patterns you want the agent to follow in future sprints
Architecture decisions with trade-offs that someone might question later

Skip:

Typos, formatting, trivial fixes
Standard library usage (the docs are better)
Findings that were auto-fixed with no investigation

3. Check for existing solutions

Before creating a new document, search for related ones:

~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/find-solution.sh "relevant keywords"
~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/find-solution.sh --tag relevant-tag
~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/find-solution.sh --file affected/file/path

If a closely related solution exists:

Update it if the new information extends or corrects the existing document
Create a new one if it's a different problem that happens to share keywords

Do not create duplicates. One good document beats two partial ones.

When updating an existing solution, evolve it:

Rewrite the compiled truth. Read the current Problem, Solution, and Prevention sections. Do they reflect what you know NOW, or what you knew when the document was created? If the new sprint changed your understanding, rewrite these sections completely — don't append to them. The compiled truth must always reflect the current best understanding, not a history of partial fixes.
Increment applied_count in the frontmatter
Set validated: true and last_validated to today's date
Adjust confidence (1-10 scale): if the solution worked perfectly this sprint → set to current + 2 (cap 10). If it worked with adjustments → keep current. If it failed or needed major changes → set to current - 2 (floor 1). Confidence determines search ranking: high-confidence solutions surface first.
Append a ### YYYY-MM-DD — Context entry to the ## History section at the bottom, documenting what happened in this sprint and what changed

Compiled truth is rewritten. Timeline is appended. The sections above History always reflect the latest understanding. The History section is the immutable evidence trail of how that understanding evolved. If old information was wrong, rewrite the compiled truth — don't leave stale text. The History entry records what changed and why.

4. Write solution documents

For each significant learning, create a document:

~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/save-solution.sh <type> "<title>" "tag1,tag2,tag3"

Types:

bug - a problem you encountered and solved
pattern - a recurring approach worth remembering
decision - an architecture or design choice with rationale

The script creates the file with YAML frontmatter and section templates. Fill in every section. Be specific:

Good:

## Problem
Stripe webhook endpoint accepted POST without signature verification.
stripe.webhooks.constructEvent() requires the raw request body, not parsed JSON.

## Solution
Use express.raw() middleware on the webhook route before express.json() parses it.

Bad:

## Problem
Webhook was broken.

## Solution
Fixed the webhook handler.

The value is in the detail. A future agent reading this needs enough context to apply the solution without re-investigating.

5. Update frontmatter

After filling in the body, update the frontmatter:

files: add the actual file paths involved
severity: adjust based on actual impact (critical, high, medium, low)
tags: add any tags that would help future search

6. Report

Print a summary of what was captured:

Compound: 3 solutions captured

  bug/stripe-webhook-signature.md (high) - Stripe webhook missing signature verification
  pattern/api-error-handling.md (medium) - Structured error responses with codes
  decision/auth-clerk-over-custom.md (medium) - Chose Clerk over custom auth

Total solutions in project: 12

After reporting, save the artifact. Run this command now — do not skip it:

~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/save-artifact.sh compound '<json with phase, summary including solutions_created, solutions_updated, total_solutions, context_checkpoint including summary, key_files, decisions_made, open_questions>'

7. Check graduation candidates

After saving solutions, check if any existing solutions now meet graduation criteria:

~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/graduate.sh

If candidates exist, report them:

N solutions ready to graduate into skill files.
Run `graduate.sh --apply` to promote them, or review with `graduate.sh` (dry-run).

Graduation means a proven, validated solution gets baked directly into a SKILL.md file — no more runtime lookup needed. Only solutions with 3+ applications, validated status, and existing referenced files qualify.

8. Check stale diarizations

If .nanostack/know-how/diarizations/ exists, check whether this sprint touched files covered by any existing diarization. If so, the diarization may be stale — suggest re-running it:

Diarization for <subject> is N days old and this sprint modified files it covers.
Consider re-running: /investigate --diarize <subject>

Then tell the user:

Knowledge captured. These solutions will be found automatically by /nano during planning and /review during code review.

Telemetry finalize

Before returning control:

_F="$HOME/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/lib/skill-finalize.sh"
[ -f "$_F" ] && . "$_F" compound success
unset _F

Pass abort or error instead of success if compound did not complete normally.

Rules

One problem per document. Don't combine unrelated fixes into one solution.
Fill every section. Empty sections are noise. If "What didn't work" is empty, either you fixed it on the first try (rare, skip the document) or you forgot to write it down.
Use the exact file paths. src/api/webhooks/stripe.ts is searchable. "The webhook file" is not.
Tags are for search, not decoration. Use terms someone would grep for: stripe, webhooks, hmac, not payment-processing-integration.
Set severity accurately. Solutions are ranked by severity when searched. Don't leave everything as medium.
Update, don't duplicate. If ~/.claude/skills/nanostack/bin/find-solution.sh returns a close match, update that document.
The Prevention section is the highest-value section. A bug fix helps once. A prevention rule helps every future sprint.

compound

/compound - Knowledge Compounding

Telemetry preamble

When to run