Cross-model review

The goal is a review people keep reading, which means one with few, correct findings rather than many plausible ones. Different models make different mistakes. Run them blind and independent, and agreement between them becomes evidence. A finding that only one model raised has to earn its place by surviving an attempt to disprove it. The same idea applies to plans: before you spend a day executing one, have a different model tear it apart.

The skill has two modes:

• Panel runs locally, with 2–3 models. Use it for PRs, diffs, plans and skills, whenever someone asks for a review.
• Precision runs as one automated reviewer on every ready PR. It allows at most 2 findings, is comment-only, and stays silent by default.

When to use / not use

Use it:

• before handing a PR to its owner (L2), or before gated self-merge (L4); agreed findings and thread dispositions are the evidence those levels need;
• before executing a plan that will take a day or more, or fan out to many workers;
• when work has made no progress for about 2 hours: write a simpler plan and run it through panel mode;
• to run review automatically on a repo where noisy bots get muted.