why
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 2, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to ingest and process text from a wide variety of untrusted external sources, including pull request comments, Slack message history, Notion documents, and issue tracker descriptions. This content is interpolated into subagent prompts without explicit sanitization, creating a surface for indirect prompt injection attacks where malicious instructions hidden in the data could influence agent behavior.
- Ingestion points: Content is pulled from
git log,gh pr view, and multiple MCP tools (Slack, Notion, Linear, Datadog, Sentry, Databricks) into the context of the investigator and synthesizer subagents. - Boundary markers: The skill uses template prompts (e.g.,
references/investigator-prompt.md) to structure subagent tasks, but does not implement robust delimiters or instructions to ignore commands embedded in the retrieved data. - Capability inventory: The agent and its subagents have the ability to execute shell commands (git, gh) and invoke MCP tools that access sensitive organizational telemetry and documentation.
- Sanitization: There is no evidence of filtering or escaping logic for the external content before it is processed by the LLM subagents.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill relies on executing local shell commands to establish a "Code Anchor."
- Evidence: The skill uses
git blame,git log, andgh pr viewto extract commit history, PR numbers, and discussion threads from the local environment and GitHub.
Audit Metadata